Safe State vs. Swing State

Ben Mason Eng. 1001 sect. 38 9/26/12 The Voting Playground Play it honorable? Or cross? This is a chafe that arises for presidential prospects every four years as we approach presidential elections. First, there argon two terms to be recognized fail-safe put forward and displace state. In a safe state the presidential candidate of a particular society has the commodious majority of support of that states voters, regularly, so that he/she can safely assume the favorable outcome of the states electoral college votes. Some ell- cognize safe states atomic number 18 California for democrats, and Texas for republicans. On the contrary, there are states that are not uniform safe states and no single candidate or party has provoke support of the votes. These are called brush states or battleground states. Some examples of jounce states of this election are Florida, Iowa, Colorado, and opposites. In the voting world, the president is moldd with representative votes by the sta tes. This is called the electoral college. A presidential candidate necessitate 270 electoral votes to win the election. For 48 states, it is a inner-takes-all election which means that whichever candidate procures a majority of the best-selling(predicate) vote, or a plurality of the ordinary vote (less than 50 percent but more than any other candidate), takes all of the states electoral votes. Maine and Nebraska are the only states that use a proportional vote system. In these states, there could be a bristle of electoral votes among candidates. (Dugan) The electoral college duck soups a huge role on the discipline of safe states and reel states by effecting the behaviors of presidential candidates. For in bearing, safe states that re known to vote a authoritative way volition not receive near as much attention or campaigning as swing states during the times close to elections. This is why candidates fight over swing states that may only have as minor as 4 electoral vote s, quite of fighting for states with a lot more. (Dugan) An example of this would be Romney and Obama spending large amounts of money campaigning in a swing state such as Iowa with 7 electoral votes and very little in a safe state like California with 55 electoral votes. (Politico) Candidates do not put a lot of labor into afe states because it is unlikely that he/she can change the minds of the people there. Also, one give not spend time and money campaigning in safe states because he/she may already have the support of the people in those states. As you can see, the electoral college is place to understanding how safe states and swing states work. There is a kind of two party dictatorship in todays American politics and the vast majority of voters fall into these two categories or parties Republican or Democratic. Every election period there are two candidates unning for these parties. In order for the candidate to get the vote of a particular state he/she must run a campaign. The pugnacity and frequency of the campaigns might vary due to the status of a partys work out over certain states. Sometimes the candidates have to modify there stance or ideals on certain issues to fit to that particular state. An example would be that some candidates may want to position themselves to appeal to a certain ethnic group of that area. Obama has tried to appeal to the Hispanic vote in Colorado due to the growing umber of Hispanic immigrants. (Larcinese) This may be a smart move because he is usually popular among minority groups. In return, Romney has tried to address people in rural areas. new-fashioned polls show that he is 14 percent more popular with people in rural areas than Obama is. (Gruber) Also, issues that are a big concern in an area may be emphasized. Things like restoring the wellness of a declining ecosystem may be brought up in an area that is suffering from deforestation or pollution to secure the votes of people concerned about that subject.Othe r factors play into campaigning in swing states as well. Many times instead of stretching the truth, a candidate will just neglect to find up the matter, whatever it may be. The sensitive issues of a certain state might be avoided in order to sound better on a vague level. Slogans are made short and vague for this soil to get anyone to jump on the band wagon. Making the issues fit the policy-making views of the people in a certain area or dry land is imperative to getting favorable votes. Candidates do whatever it takes to look unplayful or appeal to people.This sometimes means mud-slinging or making the oppose candidate look bad. This has been going on since the beginning of presidential runoffs. A great example of this would be Romneys war on women as say by Obama because of Mitt Romneys stance on issues for women. This gives the allusion that Romney doesnt care about womens health issues so that Obama would be favorable to women. (Politico) In return, Mitt Romney has attac ked Obamas healthcare pattern saying that Obama wont cover people with preexisting conditions. This is an ongoing issue that will never stop.There will always be differences in views that candidates will trash each other with. There are a vast array of ways to advertise to capture the hearts and minds of would-be voters. The key to it all is appealing to the people that have the most stake in the situation and convincing them to vote a certain way to decide the victor of the presidential race. As you can see, the role of swing states and safe state are crucial to how things are done and the way that American politics play out. Works Cited Larcinese, Valentino. Allocating the U. S. Federal Budget to the States. The Journal of Politics. Wiley Library. , 27 Apr 2006. Web. Vol. 68 May 2006 Gruber, Jonathan. Rural Favor and Polls Hastings warmheartedness Report. Wiley Library. , 8 Feb 2012. , Sep,Oct 2006 Politico. org. , News, Analysis, Candidates, and Polls. Real Clear Polls. joun ce state view. , Sep 26 2012 archive. fairvote. org/e_college. htm. , Maine and Nebraska. Center for voting and Democracy. , copyright 2002. , Dec 10 2009 Dugan, Andrew. Gallup. com/poll/swingstate. htm. , Swing State Voters. Washington D. C. , Race Track 2012 Sep 9 2012